Psychological testing in custody cases is a mandatory exercise to ensure that the kid is left in the hands of the best parent since both of them will ensure to have them to themselves and may go to extra miles to make this a reality. Since a marriage separation in most cases does not end up well, the attorney dealing with the child issue must depend on psychological testing child custody before coming up with a ruling.
The purpose of having a custody case is to make sure they are in the hands of the right parent. If this is achieved, then the kid will have the best growing environment where they will have emotional, psychological and personal growth attained without any traces of limitations.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation will have to be comprehensive enough by taking each party at a time. The parents and their kids will all be subjected to the test. Over the years, this treatment has been the commonly sought since it is scientific making it impartial. The results are never favoring one party. If the procedures used, seem to be biased there are measures kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Though it has been trusted as the best way of ensuring the child is safe, and their best interest is taken care of, this procedure has turned out not to be that perfect. Firstly, the results obtained especially during the interview can never be 100% true. The parent knowing well that they have other shortcomings known may end up lying as a way to salvage their chances of being with the kid.
More so, there is no scientific proven correlation between a parents social life and their parenting skills. If it exists, it is not always a guarantee. A parent may have a poor social life like a smoking addiction or even a past criminal record which makes them appear to lack parenting skills which they may be having. On the other hand, a person with an exemplary social life may be having the worst parenting ability.
A persons social cultural background will determine how they parent their kids especially when it comes to disciplining them. This is where most couples may seem to differ. In the event of such a case, an attorney may be blinded to give custody to one whom they share the same views of parenting. Despite the disadvantages, adequate checks still make it a good way of determining child custody.
The purpose of having a custody case is to make sure they are in the hands of the right parent. If this is achieved, then the kid will have the best growing environment where they will have emotional, psychological and personal growth attained without any traces of limitations.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation will have to be comprehensive enough by taking each party at a time. The parents and their kids will all be subjected to the test. Over the years, this treatment has been the commonly sought since it is scientific making it impartial. The results are never favoring one party. If the procedures used, seem to be biased there are measures kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Though it has been trusted as the best way of ensuring the child is safe, and their best interest is taken care of, this procedure has turned out not to be that perfect. Firstly, the results obtained especially during the interview can never be 100% true. The parent knowing well that they have other shortcomings known may end up lying as a way to salvage their chances of being with the kid.
More so, there is no scientific proven correlation between a parents social life and their parenting skills. If it exists, it is not always a guarantee. A parent may have a poor social life like a smoking addiction or even a past criminal record which makes them appear to lack parenting skills which they may be having. On the other hand, a person with an exemplary social life may be having the worst parenting ability.
A persons social cultural background will determine how they parent their kids especially when it comes to disciplining them. This is where most couples may seem to differ. In the event of such a case, an attorney may be blinded to give custody to one whom they share the same views of parenting. Despite the disadvantages, adequate checks still make it a good way of determining child custody.
About the Author:
To find out more about psychological testing child custody cases, visit this qualified doctor's website now. The following homepage contains all the facts at http://drjamesrflens.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment